She’s A Lady

Sarah Fucking Palin?

That’s all you got? Are you kidding me? A creationist fundie with a suspect fifth child? Who defers to her husband, the oil-man?

Do you really think women are so stupid as to confuse this prom queen with Hillary Clinton? How utterly demeaning and dismissive to women is it to think that we’d not notice the basic differences between this twit and Hil? Thinks birth control is the same thing as abortion? Thinks that drilling in the Arctic Wilderness is a cure for oil dependency? Thinks unlimited and unending war in Iraq is a good thing? Thinks that being a hunter is the same thing as being an environmentalist? Thinks that


intelligent design should be taught in school?

Yeah, dead ringer for our Hillary, there. What? Do the Republicans honestly think that women will be eager to vote for anything with ovaries and a vagina? Like that’s the be-all and end-all of our concerns?

And good luck with the links. This woman’s web trail is getting scrubbed on a minute-by-minute basis.

ETA: More on Palin’s judgement/circumstances of her last child’s birth.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 08/31 at 01:02 PM in Yellow Dog Politics

(4) Comments
#1. Posted by brette on August 31, 2008

at least her wiki article looked like it was written by the people on our side.

#2. Posted by Elise on September 01, 2008

I don’t get it. He rags and rags on Obama for lack of experience and he chooses someone with about three weeks of experience—from a state with more bears than people—for his running mate.

I’ve been saying all along he’d choose a woman (because ABSOLUTELY we will all switch sides and vote gender lines without any regard for issues; that’s what women DO, right??? as Samantha Bee sez, “woah woah woah, don’t overload my ladybrain!), but I truly thought he’d go with Kay Bailey Hutchison. She’s pro-military and has decades of experience—in a huge state with a huge population.

But no. Although I shouldn’t be surprised; he pretty much just just went with a running mate he could easily refer to as “the little lady,” you know?

It’d crack me up if it weren’t all so offensive.

#3. Posted by gigi on September 10, 2008

You always beat me to the punch!  Once again, my immediate reaction to the veep choice was to write a blog entry entitled Sarah Palin: are you fucking Kidding me?  And then I meant to list all those lovely qualities you and the other writers cited did ~ Anti-choice, anti-intellectual creationist book banner.  Alaskan Secessionist.  Polar bear-impending-extinction denier.  Fundamentalist wack job.  I wanted to write all that, but my cynical head was exploding.  Also, the laziness issue.  Happily, I never have to post again.  I will just come here and agree with everything you have to say.  Again.

#4. Posted by Sarah on September 13, 2008

Me too. Plus I am cutting and pasting like mad…

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main