SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, SPAM

For the last time, spam-bots, I don't give a flying rat's ass about texis hold em, fffentamine,animated porn, stories of suspect nature concerning unnatural acts between species or family members, low-interest mortgages, c1alis or any other drug promising life-endangering hards-on.
Or would that be life-endangering hard-ons. One of my friends and I have been arguing the correct plural of hard on for years. She's a Military Brat and leans toward hards-on, likening it to courts martial. I say, even in the plural, there is only one per customer, so the plural occurs at the end, hard ons. We wrote to William Saffire but he didn't think it was a serious question, we suppose, since he never responded.

Anyway. I have no interest in any of the above listed topics, and I suspect that my readers don't either, so if you would just remove me from the list, I'd appreciate it.

Not that this plea will help. But I feel better for it.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 04/27 at 02:23 PM in Geek Goddess


(3) Comments
#1. Posted by oceanguy on April 28, 2005

Might it depend on whether you are referring to more than one man ... or to more than one erection on the same man?

#2. Posted by Miz Shoes on April 29, 2005

OceanGuy, I’m sticking to my viewpoint here. Even if it is multiple erections on the same guy, they only occur one at a time. Perhaps, in the collective, many men with erections at the same time, the plural would be hards-on. I’m still waiting for a definitive answer.

#3. Posted by song on May 02, 2005

I think hard-ons sounda a little better but be assured I will be puzzling over this for days now.

I am tempted to sell myself on ebay today…

and if your spam plea sends remind me to do one - I don’t even get interesting spam anymore I just get $6BF5#@%&nFKKBV; says @^B%62jC%72bJ&hjf;^. I want natural erectile tissue enlargement dammit!

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

<< Back to main